Tuesday, 30 October 2007
Monday, 29 October 2007
Sunday, 28 October 2007
Who needs Maya?
http://www.slide.com/r/vyr-FHTi4T_XaN-A1p1l3iIwYmz1s33i
Still havent got the hang of embedding videos, sorry
Saturday, 27 October 2007
300 times a day is every Londoner recorded by CCTV

Tens of thousands of CCTV cameras, yet 80% of crime unsolved
By Justin Davenport, Evening Standard 19.09.07
London has 10,000 crime-fighting CCTV cameras which cost £200 million, figures show today.
But an analysis of the publicly funded spy network, which is owned and controlled by local authorities and Transport for London, has cast doubt on its ability to help solve crime.
A comparison of the number of cameras in each London borough with the proportion of crimes solved there found that police are no more likely to catch offenders in areas with hundreds of cameras than in those with hardly any.
In fact, four out of five of the boroughs with the most cameras have a record of solving crime that is below average.
The figures were obtained by the Liberal Democrats on the London Assembly using the Freedom of Information Act.
Dee Doocey, the Lib-Dems' policing spokeswoman, said: "These figures suggest there is no link between a high number of CCTV cameras and a better crime clear-up rate.
"We have estimated that CCTV cameras have cost the taxpayer in the region of £200million in the last 10 years but it's not entirely clear if some of that money would not have been better spent on police officers.
"Although CCTV has its place, it is not the only solution in preventing or detecting crime.
"Too often calls for CCTV cameras come as a knee-jerk reaction. It is time we engaged in an open debate about the role of cameras in London today."
The figures show:
• There are now 10,524 CCTV cameras in 32 London boroughs funded with Home Office grants totalling about £200million.
• Hackney has the most cameras - 1,484 - and has a better-than-average clearup rate of 22.2 per cent.
• Wandsworth has 993 cameras, Tower Hamlets, 824, Greenwich, 747 and Lewisham 730, but police in all four boroughs fail to reach the average 21 per cent crime clear-up rate for London.
• By contrast, boroughs such as Kensington and Chelsea, Sutton and Waltham Forest have fewer than 100 cameras each yet they still have clear-up rates of around 20 per cent.
• Police in Sutton have one of the highest clear-ups with 25 per cent.
• Brent police have the highest clear-up rate, with 25.9 per cent of crimes solved in 2006-07, even though the borough has only 164 cameras.
The figures appear to confirm earlier studies which have thrown doubt on the effectiveness of CCTV cameras.
A report by the criminal justice charity Nacro in 2002 concluded that the money spent on cameras would be better used on street lighting, which has been shown to cut crime by up to 20 per cent.
Scotland Yard is trying to improve its track record on the use of CCTV and has set up a special unit which collects and circulates CCTV images of criminals.
A pilot project is running in Southwark and Lambeth and is expected to be rolled out across the capital.
The figures only include state-funded cameras.
The true number, once privately run units and CCTV at rail and London Underground stations are taken into account, will be significantly higher.
Friday, 26 October 2007
Thursday, 25 October 2007
Wednesday, 24 October 2007
Tuesday, 23 October 2007
Monday, 22 October 2007
Invisible Architecture - smoking areas or the lack there of.
Imagine a gateway/door/entrance into a public space.
A space without walls, no barriers..
Completely open, marked only by its entrance.
A sort of invisible public architecture.
Vote Lib Dems
Videos
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=margheritawitholives
Saturday, 20 October 2007
Friday, 19 October 2007
Thursday, 18 October 2007
More Hidden Economics
Immigration will feature ever more strongly in daily politics as the 21st century unfolds. In Britain immigration will be seen as an essential component of economic growth and a prerequisite for a healthy economy. But this will not happen in the same way as in the US and Australia in the 19th and 20th centuries, when they built multicultural societies on a positive historical legacy of integrating waves of migrants through the common goal of citizenship.
Instead, by 2020 British immigration policy will be founded on the fact of our ageing society. Britain will have fewer people of working age trying to support a growing number of retired people. Britain is likely to encourage immigration on a scale that current levels only hint at, but in the process there is a danger we will develop a two-tier workforce that has more in common with the gastarbeiter economy of the old West Germany than on any American melting pot example.
The basis for that prediction lies in the United Nations report Replacement Migration, published in 2000. It estimated that Britain needs to attract a million people a year between now and 2050 to maintain the balance between the workforce and the retired population. That might be regarded as unduly pessimistic, but even the most recent figures from the government actuary suggest that by 2020 there will be 20% more older people than younger adults.
The majority of people in their 60s and 70s will be healthy and active; they will demand ever more consumer items and the personal services that go with increased leisure time. There will also be a growing welfare sector to care for the ageing population. The retirement homes of Bournemouth and Eastbourne will become key models for economic regeneration projects across the country. Home Office studies predict this will mean an increase in low-paid, low-skilled jobs that may be difficult to fill from the existing labour force.
The pattern is already beginning to emerge in the hospitality and catering industries, where low-wage jobs with little security are increasingly being filled by migrants. The government's role is to ensure they can come here legally and get paid the minimum wage. But for this strategy to succeed longer-term, British governments will have to have come to terms with the flourishing hidden economy of illegal migrants. Otherwise the two-tier workforce will be even more likely.
That means that a way to "regularise" the position of illegal migrants already in Britain will have to be found. By 2020 it could become a regular feature of British life, with amnesties granted to illegal immigrants before each general election. And if you think that could not happen, look to the US. Earlier this year, President George Bush thought it politic to give three-year work permits and possible citizenship to up to eight million "undocumented" workers living mainly in New Mexico and Arizona. His "compassionate conservative" move was, of course, really an attempt to capture the increasingly powerful Hispanic vote. Migrants here could soon hold equivalent political power.
Hidden Economics
My topic/monument this week will attempt to address the issue of "hidden economics".
More specifically, the waves of cheap labor/immigrants that have historically supported Europe in good times, eg. Turkish immigrants in continental Europe in the 60's and 70's to the current waves of New Europeans. As has always been the case, immigrants are usually happy to do the work that nobody else wants and do it for less, work longer hours with little or none of the protection that a "native" worker enjoys. In a simple manner, I wish to
address how to a large extent our economy (and our privileged "welfare") is maintained by
access to these workforces, yet this group of people is rarely acknowledged nor shown any particular appreciation. Well, it's a start anyway...
Here's a piece of a speech by Vice President Franco Frattini, European Commissioner responsible for Justice, Freedom and Security @ LSE, 23 February 2007:
Europe needs migration
The approach we are developing is realistic – it acknowledges the fact that international migration is part and parcel of today's world and that the central question is how to manage it effectively. Immigration has both a poverty and a richness strand: poverty is portrayed by the waves of illegal immigrants, victims of human trafficking, desperate and ready to risk everything in search of a better life.
This poverty has to be tackled and harnessed, and turned into richness. This in turn reflects Europe's need for selective immigration to continue its economic development and rise to the challenge of globalisation. This is the richness we imagine when looking at what the Americans have achieved, admittedly over the years and after fierce civil rights battles.
The EU needs immigration. In spite of the recent enlargement, which has brought the total population to some 490 million, the number of people living in the EU is set to decline in the coming decades and by 2050 a third will be over 65 years of age. The need for workers in many Member States, including the UK, is already evident in a number of sectors. This demand will grow as we lose 20 million workers between now and 2050.
The Lions of Trafalgar Square have finally arrived
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=search_videos&search_query=lions%20of%20trafalgar&search_sort=video_date_uploaded&search_category=0&search=Search&v=&uploaded=
Because for some reason this blog won't take them :(
Tuesday, 16 October 2007
More Billion Dollar Monument
Billion Dollar Monument
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvyQjcDTPW4 (gordon brown on burma)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NySuaJ2B20E (and jim carey on aung san)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vc0WK6DF7A (sth not too serious)
and sth of a more personal concern... a building that could have - and did for a time - become a monument:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vr_MynD-DmM
Monday, 15 October 2007
Sunday, 14 October 2007
Non-Domesticated London
in recent years, whilst huge profits (and hence huge
bonuses) in the City's investment banks has created
a group of people with so much money, they hardly
know how to spend it. The "New Americans" are picking
up penthouses in West London as ex-oligarchs shop
for football clubs...All to the amusement of the Duke of
Westminister enjoying his 100 acres of Mayfair real
estate.
Welcome to Europe's tax haven number one!
nice videos
http://video.msn.com/video.aspx/?mkt=en-gb&vid=af59eb20-7087-4c4f-a781-3b8fa1623de2&wa=wsignin1.0
Lion
http://video.msn.com/video.aspx/?mkt=en-gb&vid=af59eb20-7087-4c4f-a781-3b8fa1623de2&wa=wsignin1.0
HELP: My laptop died!
Saturday, 13 October 2007
Bruce Lee in Mostar
Friday, 12 October 2007
Thursday, 11 October 2007
Kidd of Speed - Radioactive Monument
This made the rounds at my work a few years back, mostly cause there's quite a few bike nuts and partly because it's like straight out of Stalker.
Wednesday, 10 October 2007
Alyosha - Relocation/Removal of War Memorial in Estonia


The relocation of a Soviet era war memorial in Tallinn (Estonia) to a local cemetery caused three days of rioting and looting. Following the removal, Russia was accused of engaging in cyber warfare against the country - accusations I believe were never, at least publicly, proven nor confirmed by later investigations (NATO dispatched "anti-cyberwar" teams to Estonia in the days after the attack).
I present three YouTube vids on the subject to emphasize the point I was trying to get across with my Burma demo vid - you have to consider the point of view that the story is told from.
Perhaps they're not the best choices, but there's plenty more...
BBC - Breaking News
Russia Today - Soviet Monument Controversy
ETV (Estonian TV report - subtitled)
Tuesday, 9 October 2007
David Maljkovic, Scenes for a New Heritage

Croatian-artist David Maljkovic’s epic film series Scene for New Heritage Trilogy focuses on a group of travellers visiting a memorial park, erected in Petrova Gora, Croatia, for victims of the Second World War under the Communist government of Yugoslavia. As they visit the monument, debate is sparked as to its long-forgotten meaning – it means nothing to them, just as their strange dialect is alien to us. The second film, set 20 years later, features a young boy approaching and looking out from the monument's tower to an empty snow-filled landscape, as if on some spiritual pilgrimage. The third and final film depicts young teenagers milling aimlessly around the central tower; talking, playing and walking around the derelict monument.
Scenes for a New Heritage (2004) follows a group of heritage-seekers to Petrova Gora, a memorial to the victims of the Second World War built in Croatia between 1970 and 1981. Maljkovic has set the scene on 25 May (Tito's birthday) in the year 2045, when the loaded historical background of the location would have been long forgotten. The protagonists emerge from a tinfoil-covered automobile and shout out to each other in 'ganga' , a Croatian folksong. Here, the use of a once suppressed oral tradition is more futuristic than anachronistic.
http://www.cca.rca.ac.uk/againfortomorrow/index.htm
http://www.physicsroom.org.nz/gallery/2007/maljkovic/
http://www.frieze.com/issue/review/david_maljkovic/
Monday, 8 October 2007
A subtle "hack"....?
Sunday, 7 October 2007
why democracy? please vote for me
i'm trying to download a copy of it now.
it's fascinating : )
below is the link of its synopsis.
http://silverdocs.com/festival/films/please-vote-for-me/
and its nice to see this site is not dead..
Volumetric Public Space

Not sure if this will interest any of you, but I just received an email from an organisation called "ascii" in Amsterdam - this being the flotsam from various mailing lists I subscribed to when back in 2004 I momentarily pretended to be a documentary auteur bumming round central Europe, visiting organisations that are involved in creating what's commonly referred to by the sexy title "community wireless networks" - essentially disseminators of the knowledge required to create ad-hoc computer networks using cheap tech (and frankly, many of those involved happens to be some of the most qualified and passionate geeks I've ever come across). The documentary project came to a sudden halt during IDFA in Amsterdam that same year in a haze of butter cookies and strong espressos (tangential thought: Do watch "Darwin's Nightmare" if you ever get the chance...), but that's another tale (I still have hours of unedited, embarrassingly amateurish interviews packed away on a dusty Lacie drive - all shot on an iSight at full res, which generated an incredible 5Mb per second data stream (read: unmanageable)).
The point I want to get across here, is the little known fact that the airwaves, literally "the sky" around us, is a highly segmented piece of real estate, used by governments worldwide to raise billions in revenue (recall the financially back-breaking mobile license auctions for 3g a few years back). Of course, this network also runs below us, in the shape of strands of copper and optical fiber.
What the "community wireless network"...err...community has argued for over the past few years is that the government releases more spectrum to their efforts to allow the "publics" to create their own non-commercial networks (eg. by allocating the soon-to-be available analogue telly broadcast spectrum). Unfortunately, said community is a loosely connected patchwork of organisations...My feeling is that eventually they will loose out to commercial powers like Google/telcos etc. (and perhaps one could say they already have)
But here's what I REALLY wanted to show - a piece of graphic that made a big impression on me 3 years ago. Click here to view a diagram of US spectrum allocation. Now try and see if you can track down where what we commonly refer to by its commercialized moniker "WiFi" sits (hint: it's quite small!) - this being the patch of spectrum which was de-regulated years back as it was considered a "junkspace" within the spectrum - messy and noisy as it was, being in the wavelenghts of microwaves, garage door openers and whatnot. Yet, WiFi took off in a big way perhaps even making possible the "nomadic" laptop lifestyles we now take for granted.
Something that was hinted to me back in those days was how convenient it would be if we (architects) put antennas into window frames....But I'll leave it at that for for now.
Have a look at some more graphs here and here.
Comments are welcome...
Video of Interest
After searching for something of interest this is my link to a vid I chose off you tube:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=IGo5U_KGr4c
It remains of similar interest to the aspect I had previously decided on shooting for my Burma vid, 'the space from a journalist point of view' although I have fallen into this with much raw footage, nothing really grabs me. I don't know what I should do? Well I lost four hours of work from the computer room yesterday so i could start again with a new perspective? Any way waffle waffle, henrik don't worry about it.
Saturday, 6 October 2007
Burma Demo



So I suffered almost complete technology breakdown at the demo today. Had to resort to stills and mobile phone vids with a hint of improvisation and panic...And last minute lack of courage to execute the original plan. Also felt pretty studid as the demo took off whilst I was ordering a soya latte in the Tate Britain cafe...But it's hard to fight without caffeine (in hindsight, my second demo EVAH, if marching against the closure of my school at the age of 13 and kicking in the glass doors at the Aarhus (DK) town hall (considered to be a somewhat architectural classic by the modest standards of regional Scandinavia by the way) counts for anything).
As my Flickr account (Jerome, signing up for Flickr feels almost as privacy intrusive as a Facebook account for sure!!) is pending inspection by the almighty Californian ubergeeks at Yahoo I present an even smaller selection from what I shot on the day. Where were you?
Frieze Art Fair

Slightly off-topic, but it's a good show and starts next week - and since some of you are new to London you might not know about it. Also, a good opportunity to steal enough ideas to sustain you throughout a year at the AA. On the subject of stealing, you must go to the Deutsche Bank area, pretend you're VIP and pile up as much of their glossy wannabe art mags as your malnourished, sleep deprived arms can manage...
http://www.friezeartfair.com/
Friday, 5 October 2007
super publics
"Publics" struck me as an odd word. Danah Boyd would appear to own the definition (in an AdSense) and has decided to take it one step further: super publics
CULT OF MONUMENTS
In a famous study about the 'cult of monuments', first published in 1903, Alois Riegl (Austrian Art historian and a member of the Vienna School of Art History) distinguished between two kinds of monuments: intentional and unintentional.
An intentional monument is
"a human creation, erected for the specific purpose of keeping single human deeds or events (or a combination thereof) alive in the minds of future generations" (Riegl)
Intentional monuments are concerned with commemoration, or prospective memory. In every present, they "recall a specific moment or complex of moments from the past", and thus make "a claim to immortality, to an eternal present and an unceasing state of becoming" (Riegl). Riegl believed that all of antiquity and the Middle Ages knew only intentional monuments (Riegl).
According to Riegl, unintentional monuments, which are much more numerous, are remains whose meaning is determined not by their makers, but by our modern perceptions of these monuments, i.e. by retrospective cultural memory. Riegl added that deliberate monuments can also become 'unintentional', when they were built for the benefit of contemporaries or immediate progeny only but survive much longer.
Quote-Some-More
R Koolhaas, Delirious No More, www.wired.com
Thursday, 4 October 2007
Quote-A-Lot
MONUMENTAL (excerpt from SMLXL p. 928)
"Whatever the transient political events surrounding the creation of a monument, it still has the job of articulating values in the long term. In the end, architecture creates a world of its own".
William J. R. Curtis
"I will give you a monument and a name."
Prophecy in Isaiah
In English the word "monumental" is often used in reference to something of extraordinary size and power. The word comes from the Latin "monere," which means 'to remind' or 'to warn.'
Wikipedia































